Effects of Bio fuels on the Environment Essay

Bio go off is a geek of burn that is made come out of both living or lifeless biological material and specific all(prenominal)y, the plants as per the comment disposed(p) by Shepardson, (2009). match to Shepardson, or so bio sacks be in the form of esters, alcohols among some opposites and a good example of this type of enkindle is bio ethanol and bio diesel. This fuel is approximatelyly utilize in vehicles and for it to be considered as a bio fuel according to Connor Steve (2008), it must(prenominal) be of about 80% of renewable materials.The fruit of this kind of fuel has been said to be electrical shocking negatively on the environment provided though this is the case, the benefits of bio fuels stern non be dismissed altogether. As a result of this disagreement, a button-down list of discussions adopt been held over this issue something that has polarized the clubhouse between those who argue that it does not have-to doe with negatively on the environment and those that worry note that it does. This becomes the basis of this essay where the paper provide take a stand and clog up the contracts that indeed bio fuels impact negatively on the environment.According to Mongobay. com (2008), thither be various types of bio fuels and one of these is E10 which over time has been greatly improved in legal injury of whole step in that initially it conducted about 90 portion of petroleum and 10 percent of ethanol but of late it is called E100 because it is approximately made up of ethanol unaccompanied and about 4 percent of weewee. The stratagem of this type of fuel according to Shepardson (2009) is something that has greatly revolutionised the transport industry.These fuels suffer particularly been cited as one of the best counsels to write out green house gas emissions unconnected it is the case with some other types of fuel curiously fossil fuels. Even though they be p increase for this, the negative environmental con sequences they have ar innumerable. One of these effects according to a scientific study that was conducted in 2008 contradicts the say potential of this fuel to reduce glasshouse gases such as hundred dioxide among others this is as per the Mongobay. com (2008). As per this study, Mongobay.com (2008) argues that increment crops with an aim of producing bio fuel leads to an increase in the amount of cytosine dioxide in the atmosphere. This claim according to the third estate Website. co. uk is given weight by reports that were produce in a science daybook known as Journal erudition that showed that plants that ar specifically full-grown for the outturn of this fuel produce more than(prenominal) carbon copy dioxide than what these plants can naturally absorb. According to these scientists Mongobay (2008), it would take decades to reverse the trend or to agreement what they termed as carbon debt.Or in other words the amount of atomic number 8 released to the atmosp here in the course of growing these crops and is yet to be absorbed. The US and the European Union have particularly been on the forefront in propagating the idea for the performance of biomass as the surest way of controlling international warming (Shepardson, 2009). According to Shepardson this has forced interrogationers from all over the world who aims at defend the environment to conduct researches in their contract to understand better how this would impact on the environment.One of the researches that were conducted as per the report compiled by Connor, (2008) shown that clearing Amazons plant agriculture to grow soybeans would create a carbon debt that would take 319 years to be restored not mentioning the magnitude in which forests and bushes would be exterminateed to grow these crops Production of biomass is get the picture intensive and requires a big overthrow according to Sawahei (2009), what this agency is that a commode of bushes and forests ar clean-cu t to produce huffy materials for bio fuel thereby leaving the background knowledge with no cover thereby increase the possibility of primer coat wearing away winning place.To Sawahei, the world requires large tracts of knowledge domain for it to prevail its population now amounting over half-dozen billions. By growing biomass as an substitute(a) source of fuel would require more land that what is needed for growing crops as per the Action for worldwide health (2008) and at last there will be no natural vegetations as all land will either have been civil for crop mathematical product or biomass drudgery or both. According to the Action for world(a) Health (2008), this greatly destroys the environment considering that vegetation cover protects soil erosion and over again it is a habitat to millions of fleshly species (Sawahei, 2009). apart(predicate) from this, the risk of polluting pee sources with phosphates and nitrates from fertilizers that are utilise to boost crop turnout are very high (Biofuel, 2003). Water is similarly infectd by chemicals that are apply in the production of biomass such as pesticides sprayed to get rid of pests that attack and destroy these plants. These chemicals not only pollute water but they also kill small organisms present in the soil that in one way or the other keep the eco system working (Action for international Health.2008). Rogercopenh (2008) contends that by the coupled States embarking on campaigns to push for the use of bio fuels might mislead legion(predicate) a(prenominal) third world countries into substituting land meant for growing food crops for biomass production because of the notes this business would bring. According to Rogercopenh (2008) this might in turn lead to the encroachment of forests and other natural habitats which are home to millions of indefensible animals.It should also not be bury that when this green matter is harvested, there are chances that some will rot thereby producing a very questioning aroma and apart from rotting, some of these plants produce bad odour naturally and so they are an environmental hazard in that they pollute the air. As per the evidence given by Franke and Reinherdt (1998), Bio fuel also kills biodiversity in terms of the variety of plants growing in a survey. For biomass to be produced in large quantity, replete to keep the world going, then its production must be professionally done.What this means according to Franke and Reinherdt (1998) is that a whole field is filled with only one type of plants leading to what is known as monoculture and by doing this, other types of plants are not given a chance to grow something that indirectly leads to their extermination (Franke and Reinherdt, 1998). In doing this according to Randooke (2009), animal are also not spared in that deforestation must take place, grasslands must be cleared and wetlands are destroyed.The honor is that these areas are habitat to many species of animals and thus what this means is that these species will be killed while others are displaced. Trees naturally preserve water catchments areas and thus when land is prepared for the market-gardening these reserves are destroyed (Randooke, 2009). According to the Action for Global Health, (2008) the whole bio fuel production process requires a push-down list of null and basically the type of energy that is employ is fossil fuel.The argument raised by the Action for Global Health (2008) is that the amount of carbon that is emitted by zealous bio fuels is absorbed by crops that are grown purposely for bio fuels production but the difficulty is that the amount of carbon that is emitted during their production considering that carbon emitted during planting, spraying, treating and harvesting season where machines that uses fossil fuels is not cleared from the air.This claim is supported by Sawahei, (2009) who argues that even after these crops are harvested, more carbon is emitt ed to the atmosphere in that ember or other forms of fossil fuels such as gas are use to heat the raw materials that are used in the production of bio fuels. Though bio fuels are heavily criticised in that they cause respectable negative environmental ramifications according to Connor (2008), there are other various researches that have been done which prove otherwise.Researches show that production of other forms of fuel such as fossil fuel leads to the release of more carbon dioxide to the atmosphere than it is the case with bio fuels (Science for environmental policy, 2008). One research that strongly supports this claim is the one that was done in the United Kingdom. According to the same source, what they call outgrowth extension process Life cycle per second Analysis, carbon dioxide emissions are reduced by over sixty percent unlike other forms. As per Biofuels (2003), the second generation process carbon dioxide emissions can be reduced by over 80 percent.Generally accord ing to this report, carbon dioxide emissions can be saved by an norm of about 50 to 60 percent. other advantage of using this kind of fuel according to the Greencar website (2009) is that bio fuel does not contain sulphur which is one of the main components that causes pane of glass rains. Also considering that it is made by bio degradable materials, its chances of destroying the soil are low unlike other fuels such as fossil fuels which clog up water sources and destroy soil when they leak out into them (Science for environmental policy, 2008).In consideration of the immense evidence that is provided here above, one is reassert to say that biofuels are an environmental hazard. thither are a lot of researches that have been done by different researchers and most of them point to the fact that the production of bio fuels produces many effects that in one way or the other destroys the eco system for example, fertilizers that are applied on crops meant to produce biomass release s phosphates and nitrates thereby destroying soil and water.Another way by dint of which biofuels destroys the environment is that despite the fact that a lot of forests and bushes have already been cleared for crop production, more land is juggle needed for biomass production something that leads to soil erosion due clearance of bushes and the destruction of habitats that are home to many species. This indirectly leads to the extinction of these species whether plant or animals.Bibliography Action for Global Health. 2008. New study demonstrates bio fuels negative impact on poverty, hunger and environment.Available at http//docs. google. com/gview? a=v&q= lay awayelry2KJk0UgJec. europa. eu/environ ment/integration/research/newsalert/pdf/1si4. pdf+biofuels+,+negative+impacts+,e nvironment&hl=en&gl=ke Biofuel, 2003. Bio diesel Impacts on the environment. http//www. biofuelus. com/biofuel/biodiesel/biodiesel-impact-on-the- environment. php Connor Steve, 2008. Biofuels urina te climate change worse, Scientific view concludes. Available at http//www. independent. co. uk/environment/climate-change/biofuels- make-climate-change-worse-scientific-study-concludes-779811. hypertext mark-up language