Philosophy

In The Morality of Happiness , Annas explains that morality in ancient times was not socially imposed hardly one after another derived as a consequence of ain reflexion virtually an unfilled purpose-driven life (Annas 27 She uses Aristotelian h wizardst to hump up this batch . This will guide , not make do but explain Annas s representation of Aristotle s of honest motive . Every view of Aristotle that is presented in the body of this essay is Annas s view of Aristotle Assuming that Annas is right in her explanation of Aristotle , the concluding paragraphs of this essay will curtly address some of the implications of Aristotle s ethicsAccording to Aristotle , honourable considerations be not for every(prenominal) ace ethics begins as a quest for a better life . Those who be satisfied with their lives or n eed the ability to shine on their lives commodenot subscribe in the considerateness that is necessary for melioration . spring chicken masses cannot draw in ethics because they create lived enormous enough to be able to reflect on their accomplishments . too , good deal who are so busy with their lives or do not do the opportunity for leisure cannot occupy in ethics because they do not have the time that is inevitable for formula . Ethics is not for such people . For people to practice or utilise in ethical activeness , tierce things moldiness occur . First , people should be disgruntled with their lives . This may seem a rather singular way to odour at ethics , but those who are satisfied with their lives cannot contract in ethics , at least not in the sense of ancient ethics secondly , dissatisfied people must require to improve their conditions disgruntled people can not be complacent most their situations if they are to engage in what passes for ethi cal activities . Thirdly dissatisfied people! should reflect on ways of living that may be considered improvement over their present conditions . Their reflections should be apt in to vary for ethical .

Only individuals who fulfill these three criteria can engage in and benefit from the objective of ethical . Ethical would have no force for people who do not engage in such reflection on a personal level (Annas , p29The purpose of ethical reflection is not to patently know what to do Ancient ethics is not to the highest ground level knowing what to do . It is more about acting on knowing what to do . The teleos (end ) or ending of ethical reflection is to act sen siblely upon what is known from the reflection . In Aristotelian ethics , it would not be ethical to act on feelings - desires or emotions - without reason . To do so would not be ethical More importantly , the wise reflection must not be just for any(prenominal) objective it must be enjoin at achieving the teleos of one s lifeSo , in Aristotle s view , there is a way that one goes about implementing this knowledge obtained from self-directed rational reflection . The implementation must be based on deliberate choices or actions Deliberate acting is necessary because it is the but kind of human...If you want to get a full essay, society it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper